News
Judiciary Committee Reviews New Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Kavanaugh
< < Back to judiciary-committee-reviews-new-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-kavanaughUpdated at 1:02 p.m. ET
The Senate Judiciary Committee is reviewing a statement from a third woman who has come forward with sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
The allegations, from a woman identified as Julie Swetnick, were made public by attorney Michael Avenatti on Wednesday morning.
Avenatti posted Swetnick’s three-page sworn declaration on Twitter.
NPR is not reporting some of the details involved in the allegations; attempts to contact Swetnick had not succeeded on Wednesday morning.
Kavanaugh has denied all accusations of sexual misconduct.
“This is ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone,” he said in a statement released by the White House. “I don’t know who this is and this never happened.”
President Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh, fired back on Twitter against Avenatti, who has become a political enemy since his suit against Trump on behalf of porn actress Stormy Daniels.
Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court once appeared to be a sure thing. Those prospects now are left uncertain.
In the sworn declaration posted on Twitter, Swetnick alleges that during the years 1981-1983 she was at several parties that Kavanaugh also attended.
Swetnick writes that she observed Kavanaugh drunk, press himself against girls without their consent and engage in other such behavior. Swetnick writes that she was raped at one party that Kavanaugh attended.
Judiciary Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said in a statement that the panel has received Swetnick’s statement and is looking into the allegations.
“This morning Michael Avenatti provided a declaration to the Judiciary committee,” Foy said. “Committee lawyers are in the process of reviewing it now.”
Kavanaugh addresses high school parties
Kavanaugh has been asked before about the culture of partying and drinking from his high school days.
“That’s totally false and outrageous,” he said. “I’ve never done any such thing, known about any such thing.”
Separately, the Judiciary Committee posted a statement from Kavanaugh on Wednesday morning in which he acknowledged partying but no sexual impropriety.
“I drank beer with my friends, usually on weekends,” he wrote. “Sometimes I had too many. In retrospect, I said and did things in high school that make me cringe now. But that’s not why we are here today. What I’ve been accused of is far more serious than juvenile misbehavior.”
Some of Kavanaugh’s classmates have told other news organizations they recall a different person from the early and mid 1980s in high school and college.
Scandal
Swetnick’s allegations follow those of two other women who have said they were victims of sexual misconduct involving Kavanaugh decades ago, when they and he were in high school or college.
The charges have disrupted what appeared to be a sure confirmation for Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court following his hearings before the Judiciary Committee, which took place before the sexual misconduct allegations became public.
The allegations that appeared on Wednesday further complicate a much-anticipated hearing scheduled for Thursday with Kavanaugh and another of his accusers, Christine Blasey Ford.
Opponents of Kavanaugh have called for the Judiciary Committee to hear testimony from other accusers beyond Ford; Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa has so far not agreed. One question raised by Swetnick’s charges on Wednesday was whether she might appear too or whether Grassley might delay the hearing scheduled for Thursday.
Democrats argued on Thursday that the new allegations mean Republicans must suspend Kavanaugh’s confirmation process. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said he thought the judge should bow out.
“I strongly believe Judge Kavanaugh should withdraw from consideration,” he said. “If he will not, at the very least, the hearing and vote should be postponed while the FBI investigates all of these allegations. If our Republican colleagues proceed without an investigation, it would be a travesty for the honor of the Supreme Court and our country.”
Gadfly
It wasn’t clear how Avenatti had become involved with the Kavanaugh case, but he has spent months cutting out a role for himself as an antagonist of the president.
He sued on behalf of Daniels, whose given name is Stephanie Clifford, to escape a nondisclosure agreement she signed with Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen. That kept alive Daniels’ account of a sexual relationship with Trump in 2006, a story which Cohen has acknowledged paying her to not tell ahead of Election Day in 2016.
Trump has acknowledged payments to women ahead of the election but denies their underlying allegations about sexual relationships.
Avenatti also surfaced business relationships that Cohen forged with corporate clients early in the Trump administration — he was paid because he said he could provide access to Trump for companies such as AT&T and Novartis.