New Carbon Emissions Proposal Adds To Legacy Of Clean Air Act< < Back to
The federal EPA’s release of proposed rules to control carbon dioxide emissions has created quite a stir in Ohio which produces and uses a lot of coal. But clean air regulation is nothing new to Ohio. The new proposal is just the latest in decades of efforts to improve the environment.
In the 1960s and 70s, pollution was becoming more deadly. Smog, soot, noxious chemicals from industry all spewed into the air. The head of Ohio University’s Consortium for Energy, Economics and the Environment, Scott Miller, said the American public wanted it cleaned up.
“We had things like the Cuyahoga River catching fire in Cleveland. We had lots of work going on to promote an environmental consciousness in the United States,” said Miller.
Soon, calls for environmental action reached the White House. President Richard Nixon presaged federal action in his 1970 State of the Union address.
“The great question of the 70s is, shall we surrender to our surroundings or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, our land, and our water,” said President Nixon.
Later that year, Congress passed the Clean Air Act. For the first time the U.S.had national air and water quality standards. Miller said polluting industries were on notice.
“Industry definitely understood and knew what was going on at that time,” said Miller.
The new pollution standards caused controversy, and spawned industry changes. The petroleum industry developed unleaded gas. Cars and trucks were downsized.
In 1977, congress strengthened the Clean Air Act and Miller said that led to new pollution control technology for factories and power generating plants.
“We started to see the phase in of scrubber technology and other control technology to capture some of those harmful pollutants at the source and try to control at the time right there so we were not releasing it directly into the air,” said Miller.
As environmental science improved, researchers found more direct links between emissions and degradation of the environment. Acid rain in New England was connected to sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants in Ohio and other states.
In 1988, air pollution became an issue in the presidential campaign between Michael Dukakis and George H.W. Bush.
By 1990, more restrictive amendments were added to the Clean Air Act to reduce emissions linked to Acid Rain. But there was a new wrinkle.
The feds turned to a market based system to encourage pollution control – the cap and trade system. Major polluters could buy and sell pollution credits on an exchange market similar to commodities like corn, sugar, and cotton.
“That market based strategy was the basis for the cap and trade system for carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions that the Obama Administration proposed in 2008,” said Miller.
Three years after being proposed by President Obama, the EPA finalized national standards for mercury, dioxin and acid gas emissions and turned its attention to green house gases, namely carbon dioxide. The worry turned from acid rain to global warming.
This week’s proposal calls for 30 percent reduction in carbon dioxide from power generating plants by the year 2030.
Miller predicts industry compliance will again be contentious. He said government and industry will be able to draw on a 40-year record of regulatory mandates and industry responses.
“You know there are plenty of really smart people that work for the utility industry. There are plenty of really smart people in academia teaming up and working together. You know I have no doubt that we’ll be able to tackle this problem,” said Miller.
The rule making process is a long one. The EPA will conduct public hearings before finalizing the standards next summer.